Search for: "US v. John Doe" Results 6861 - 6880 of 11,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am by jonathanturley
  Chief Justice John Roberts also criticized the use of the shadow docket in 2022 when the Court voted 5-4 to restore a Trump-era rule limiting states’ and Native American tribes’ power over large energy projects. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm by Barry Sookman
Brecknell, 2018 BCCA 5 Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v Telewizja Polska, S.A. 883 F.3d 904 (D.Col.Cir. 2018) US v Vaulin 2017 WL 3334861 (N.D.Ill.2017) Nazerali v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(for now) – District Court C D California judgement in Carter Bryant v Mattel (Property, intangible) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golden – Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint: Golden v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am by Peter Margulies
Judge Bybee’s methodical opinion could have used elaboration in one important respect: distinguishing the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
We don’t have to stretch that far: the president does not have Congress’s ability to condition federal spending on state cooperation with federal policy. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:21 pm
" When I cover the plain view doctrine in class, I use this example to illustrate how it works: Officers are executing a warrant to search John Doe's home for stolen TV sets. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Cindy Cohn
Or does the government plan to stop using commercial communications technologies altogether? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:00 am by Cindy Cohn
Or does the government plan to stop using commercial communications technologies altogether? [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
“It has been said that though God cannot alter the past, historians can; it is perhaps because they can be useful to Him in this respect that He tolerates their existence. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]