Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
Adam Schaeffer of the Cato Institute writes in All of Your Money Belongs to the State that the 9th circuit thinks just that: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in an appeal of a 9th Circuit decision, Winn v Garriott, a challenge to one of Arizona’s education tax credit programs. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am
At the Concurring Opinions blog, Gerard Magliocca has a post titled “Interesting Cases You’ve Never Heard of – The Pueblo Indians” in which he discusses the Court’s 1876 opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v Kentucky opened the door for an argument that I have always supported-a criminal defense lawyer needs to inform a non-citizen client of the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
It turns out in 1923 he made a bronze scuplture, “Bird in Space,” that he shipped to the United States in 1927. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:47 pm
The Bill represents the coalition government’s response to the Supreme Court’s decision in HM Treasury v Ahmed (incidentally, the first appeal to have been heard in the Supreme Court) concerning the lawfulness of measures enabling the Treasury to freeze the assets of, amongst others, a person whom it has reasonable grounds for suspecting is or may be a person who facilitates the commission of acts of terrorism. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:28 am
In September of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard a case involving a Regional Rehab Director who claimed he was fired due to his age and retaliated against. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
After the publication of Paul Brest's Misconceived Quest one heard talk that originalism was dead as a serious intellectual movement. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm
In August of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard a case involving an electric power board employee who claimed he was fired due to his age and retaliated against and worked in a hostile work environment. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
” See United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
’ (PatLit) PCC Update 1: new regime, new judge, old case, old rules: Technical Fibre Products Ltd & Anor v Bell & Ors (PatLit) Formula 1 fight for right to race as Nelumbo Nucifera (IPKat) Summary judgment, but no quick fix on costs: Patents County Court decision in Nike International Ltd & Ors v Bateman (IP finance) United States US Patents USPTO announces launch of second peer to patent pilot program (Inovia IP) (IP Watch) (IP: KCE)… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
From 2001 to 2004, Olson was, unsurprisingly, Solicitor General of the United States following his victory in Bush v Gore which permitted President Bush to take office. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
When I wrote the post that gave Kent fodder to shoot at Moore's lawyer, I certainly didn't think about the potential that it would be used in a brief before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:10 am
State of Arizona, Case No. 10-16645, will be heard by a three judge panel on Monday, November 1, 2010 at 9 a.m. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:22 am
The New York Times recently editorialized on the family’s quest to hold the makers of the damaging vaccine accountable reached the United States Supreme Court last week, when the Justices heard oral arguments in the case Bruesewitz v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:08 am
United States provides, to a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
