Search for: "Wells v. Heard*" Results 6861 - 6880 of 9,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm by Tom Lamb
This October 2010 New Jersey Trial Result Is In Stark Contrast To $3.2 Million Verdict In 2009 Montana Zometa Case (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) In early October 2010 the New Jersey state court jury which heard the evidence in the case of Bessemer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:50 am by Lyle Denniston
The constitutional dispute over same-sex marriage in Utah is the furthest along in the federal courts of all of the cases on that issue since the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Ada Mae Day worked just as hard as her husband, in a household that lacked running water and electricity until Sandra was 7, but according to Lazy B she “never stopped trying to dress well and take care of herself. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
This is potentially a cost of $6.5 million a year for Canadian taxpayers, which seems absurd in view of the Supreme Court of Canada's CCH v. [read post]