Search for: "White v. United States" Results 6861 - 6880 of 7,208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, s 1503. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:10 am
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeCourt States Patient's Medical Malpractice Action Barred By Signed ReleaseBeck v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
No. 07A630 Title: James Callahan, Applicant [www.supremecourtus.gov] v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:20 pm
Not Prosecutors in Virginia.In the State Of Virginia's relentless pursuit to execute a retarded man (See, Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 4:37 am
The justices already are considering whether a prosecutor improperly excluded blacks from a jury and then inflamed the all-white panel with references to the O.J. [read post]