Search for: "Young v. State" Results 6861 - 6880 of 8,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
 However, when considering the effect of a parody, he held that it is a common understanding that a parody must have a somehow humorous effect, and that it is left to (seemingly the courts) Member States to define what is humorous, also depending on different national sensitivities. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
  By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29]  However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same, despite… [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Although I was in V&E’s Energy Section, young lawyers were encouraged by the firm to take pro bono appeals to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:26 am by scottgaille
Although I was in V&E’s Energy Section, young lawyers were encouraged by the firm to take pro bono appeals to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Although I was in V&E’s Energy Section, young lawyers were encouraged by the firm to take pro bono appeals to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
The Roberts Court has ruled against tribal interests on numerous occasions, although admittedly the language and tenor of the decision last year in Michigan v. [read post]