Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
The suit alleges that those companies' Bluetooth-based computers, cell phones or headsets violate at least one patent issued to a former UW student, Edwin Suominen, and now held and protected by the foundation. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
In fact, MVS has counseled many such companies on exactly that! [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:40 am
The Westchester jury found the driver only 10% at fault while charging plaintiff with 30% of the fault and the landscaping company with 60%. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:05 pm
P. 23(c)(2). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:28 pm
First, the Court unanimously concluded that Section 271(b) requires actual knowledge of the patent. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 2:02 pm
§ 1115.13(c) and (d). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:00 am
But when it comes to corporate depositions, there are no exceptions to sections 2025.250(b) and (c). [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
D/B/A LAS COLINAS MEDICAL CENTER v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:04 pm
Similarly, Section 2(c) of FERA would amend the false loan application statute (18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 am
Must have had an opportuity to be heard; B. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:26 am
Specifically, Section 230 was intended to clarify "that if a company unknowingly leaves up illegal third-party content, it is protected from publisher liability by §230(c)(1); and if it takes down certain third-party content in good faith, it is protected by §230(c)(2)(A). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
: The Board looked to the non-exclusive factors set out in Section 43(c)(2)(B).Beginning with the similarity between the marks, it found this factor favored Opposer, noting that the survey evidence "shows that more than thirty-five percent of the survey respondents associate applicant's slogan with opposers' slogan (or with the pork being promoted by the mark) in an unaided survey response. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:50 pm
I wonder what noted currency hawk and the authors' PIEE colleague C. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:53 pm
The plaintiff in Garcia was a taxicab driver who worked for a cab company for several years before suing the company, alleging he should have been treated as an employee, not an independent contractor. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
The CFPB acknowledges in the final rule that (a) none of the 562 class actions it studied was tried on the merits, (b) only 12.3% of the class actions had final settlements approved during the study period, (c) the average cash payment to settlement class members was $32 and (d) the attorneys for the plaintiffs were paid $424,495,451. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:21 pm
For this reason, the group suggested that SEC rules clearly provide that an offering of fund shares pursuant to Rule 506 or Rule 144A utilizing general solicitation or general advertising will not be a public offering for the purposes of Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:08 pm
Gordon and Jeffrey C. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:58 am
B is for Bill C-51, the anti-terrorism bill, which became a flashpoint political issue on striking the right balance between surveillance and civil liberties. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm
Id. at § 227(b)(1)(C). [read post]
15 May 2012, 10:22 am
i) On February 12, 2007, a press release announced approval of the transaction by authorities under the Investment Canada Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 28 (1st Supp.), and provided the names of the executives for the new company. [read post]
