Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 6881 - 6900 of 15,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2017, 3:58 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The applicant does not agree and does not pay additional search fees. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:55 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Maryland and Vermont delegations, however, were evenly divided (4-4 and 1-1, respectively), and so neither candidate received the requisite vote of nine states. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 3:27 pm by Chuck Cosson
This blog previously dealt with one flavor of “fake news”: provocative fictions that can prompt panic and violence.[1]  These issues have not gone away; one recent headline suggested a false report prompted a nuclear threat.[2]  In this blog, though, I’ll deal with a related issue:  propaganda. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  The injunction was continued on 23 December 2019 ([2016] NSWSC 1910). [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The defendants argue that these contentions are misconceived because the Court of Appeal correctly concluded that A v BBC did not alter the applicable principles – which are derived from Re S ([2005] 1 AC 593) and Re Guardian News and Media ([2010] 2 AC 697). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 5:01 pm by David Kopel
For example, when China was ruled by the Mongols, the arms prohibition on the subjugated Chinese was so severe that only 1 out of 10 families was allowed a carving knife. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Sept. 23, 2016) many courts since Spokeo have placed dispositive weight on whether a plaintiff alleges the violation of a substantive, rather than procedural, statutory right. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:38 am by Candace Shields
Also worth highlighting, this change only applies to DoD, and does not provide the same discretion to civilian contracting officers. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:38 am
DISH PIZZA Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness for Pizza, Says TTABPrecedential No. 18: TTAB Reverses Refusal of the Color White for Gunpowder ChargesPrecedential No. 7: Lack of Exclusive Use Dooms “AYOUB” 2(f) Surname ApplicationApplication Requirements/Lawful Use/Specimen of Use:Precedential No. 32: Marijuana Vaporizers Are Illegal Under CSA, TTAB Affirms Two "JUJU" RefusalsPrecedential No. 23: TTAB Affirms Refusal Of "pitchingsmart" Due To Faulty I.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:47 am by Christopher Simon
§ 51-3-23 (2) (“an owner of land who either directly  . . . invites or permits without charge any person to use the property for recreational purposes does not thereby . . . [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:13 am by William K. Berenson
The state or city is often aware that a road or intersection is unusually dangerous and does nothing about it. [read post]