Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
By failing to produce the AG's Opinion in English, it is withheld not only from the English and Irish contingent, but from nationals (and courts) in many other states who can read decisions in English but cannot read them in (say) Latvian.The failure of the court to produce an English translation, or a French translation, of a critical opinion is ludicrous. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
Commission shows just how sensitive and litigious the member States are about languages. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:21 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
Stuart v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:54 pm
The judges' hands were "somewhat tied" by Nichia v Argos (noted by the IPKat here) which, he considered, removed the judges' ability to apply mandatory procedural controls, such as those proposed in the Burdon Plan. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Aug. 7, 1990); In re English Seafood (USA) Inc., 743 F.Supp. 281, 286-89 (D.Del.1990) (holding that the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claim for corporate dissolution, but that the court should abstain from exercising it); Codos v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
She is of Somali origin and has a poor understanding of English. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
In mid-March, the Court granted certiorari in Negusie v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
That was for the specific reason that one of the important Indian cases on the point - State of UP v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:41 am
It contained an arbitration clause which stated that, in the event of disagreement or dispute, the parties should appoint an arbitrator in Paris. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:14 am
The current state of the law on pre-nuptial agreements received a pretty thorough airing in the case of NG v KR (Pre-nuptial contract) [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Bowen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:08 pm
Dorf applauds the unanimous Court's ability to ignore (implicitly, unlike Bush v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 7:58 pm
His dissenting opinion concludes:The previously "narrow" border search exception, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In Goldsmith v. [read post]
