Search for: "Little v State" Results 6881 - 6900 of 26,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
HB 25 garnered little debate or controversy and will allow the State Engineer to consider nonuse when acting on change applications. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am by Kara M. Maciel
Simply stated, in the private club industry, a little “discrimination” can go a long way in avoiding potential lawsuits based on discrimination! [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The decision letter addressed the Mohammed criteria (R v Camden LBC exp Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by David Super
  In a system built to require some supermajority to enact legislation, it makes sense that we can change very little of substance. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 3:16 pm by Ilya Somin
Here is an excerpt: On Thursday, the Supreme Court rejected, in California v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 7/30/09Cite: IBM v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
The parties stipulated in January 2015 that his conviction was on appeal, but it has since been affirmed, see State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:27 am
The TLC stated that it used `GPS technology installed in taxicabs’ to make this discovery. . . [read post]