Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 6:06 am
Lead federal prosecutor Mark H. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 5:56 am
But the number of American troops killed, according to Mark Shields, has increased twenty percent. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:18 pm
They now want Congress to amend the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
by Mark Moller In a recent post, Stephen Gardner makes some interesting comments about my recent article, Class Action Lawmaking: An Administrative Law Model. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
It wrote: Section 9(e)(1) reflects Congress's intent to subject union-security arrangements to employee veto. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:14 pm
I do agree with Prof. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 4:09 pm
Today marks the opening of the Holocaust museum in Washington, DC. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:15 am
Justice Mark C. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
So it is fitting and proper that we quote from these lyrics, as we mark your passing from the halls of justice: And it seems to me, you lived your lifeLike a candle in the windNever knowing who to cling toWhen the rain set inAnd I would have liked to have known youBut I was just a kidYour candle burned out long beforeYour legend ever did Eternal rest grant unto the Justice Department career of Monica Goodling, O Lord. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:53 pm
Tim, is this the way the Democrats wanted to get off the mark in terms of foreign affairs? [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
Our liability opinion identified two realistic possibilities for what would have occurred had Rambus not engaged in deception of JEDEC members: either (i) JEDEC would have chosen alternative technologies, or (ii) JEDEC would have incorporated Rambus’s technologies into the standard but would have demanded, as a precondition of adopting Rambus’s technology, that Rambus agree to license the technology on RAND terms. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:30 pm
That's 24 Senators and 151 Representatives - nearly a quarter of the US Congress! [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:42 pm
I wonder, though, whether it is also a problem of President Bush's devising. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932 2 v. (1942) Holmes, Oliver Wendell; Pollock, Frederick; Howe, Mark De Wolfe (Editor). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
"I created it, it's mine" is a powerful claim. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
Mark P. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 10:57 pm
Congress needs a diverse set of viewpoints. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 8:01 am
(I want to see the evidence for this - I'm sure it's true for some kids, but how many? [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:23 am
-- I'll settle on that. [read post]
