Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6881 - 6900
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Circuit in People's Mojahedin Org. of Iran v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
The argument behind Janus v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:59 pm
Gibson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:08 am
In Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark | BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle | Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In Harris v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
First up is Currier v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
Today, Judge Leon presides over yet another ground-breaking case with similar themes: United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
Today, Judge Leon presides over yet another ground-breaking case with similar themes: United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Although it is unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:23 pm
” Id. at *2 (citing Rhines v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
United States Vanity Fair reports that BuzzFeed is suing the Democratic National Committee to force it to turn over documents relevant to a libel suit the publisher is facing over its publication of Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, Research and Resources Mark Pearson has, via Journlaw, published his review of the text What is journalism? [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm
If the local authority oversteps the mark a human right may have been infringed. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Nancy Kim, The License v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Complete the look: Ralph Lauren Polo sweaterKat friend Just Wang analyses another Singaporean opposition trade mark case, in which passing off was relied on as the single (and successful) ground of opposition: When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark.In the conclusion of another trade mark battle, Mr Justice Arnold has handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155: BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm
Purple Innovation, LLC v. [read post]
