Search for: "People v. New"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 41,478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm
See also People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr explained what the Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Monroe’s image by others, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Milton Green Archives v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:41 am
(Lemmon v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:10 am
The problems were compounded after a new Surgeon-in-Chief, Dr. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
Most people are not in a position to negotiate the arbitration provision, particularly new hires who want the job and don't have the gumption to take issue with arbitration; they have no bargaining power, and what new employee argues with management about where they might take any future employment dispute? [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:01 am
” DeJoria v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:42 am
” And they ordered ICE to let people go. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Georgia Officials Call Plaintiff Voters “Bystanders” Who Lack Standing to Sue and Dismiss Serious Technical Issues as “Glitches”Atlanta, Georgia—The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Free Speech for People (FSPF) urged a federal appeals court today to hold that a group of Georgia voters and the organization that supports them have standing to sue the Georgia Secretary of State over the implementation of defective voting systems they say deprives them of… [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 10:02 am
(This Q&A was first published in Stanford News on June 9, 2021.) [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
For instance, in Robles v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also create broad new mandatory sanctions on Chinese entities engaged in U.S. cyberattacks or theft of U.S. intellectual property from U.S. firms, and provides for a review of export controls on items that could be used to support human rights abuses. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:41 am
They were debating whether much of the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
The Justice Department cited the Supreme Court’s reasoning in FDA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm
Ferguson, which held that segregation did not imply Black people's inferiority, and instead only mentioned its ideas in discussing Brown v. [read post]
