Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 176,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
On March 23, 2010, Northern District Judge, Susan Illston, granted plaintiff’s motion to certify plaintiff’s misclassification claims in Brady v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:58 am
One of the issues canvassed at trial related to the Plaintiff’s potential to succeed in his sport. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
The defendant used the plaintiff's registered marks in both the metatags of its website as well as in white text on a white background in the body of the site in an effort to cause consumers searching for the plaintiff's marks on an internet search engine to be more likely to go to the defendant's website instead. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:09 pm
Defendants already owned and operated a Wendy’s in Cleveland, and in 1998 one of plaintiff’s brothers signed a non-compete agreement with defendants agreeing not to open a Wendy’s in Cleveland. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:08 pm
Here, in the AGC’s own words, is the Overview of the AGC’s response. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Green, 411 U.S. 792, whereby upon the plaintiff's making a prima facie case of retaliation the burden shifts to the employer to demonstrate action was not in the nature of retaliation but made for legitimate business reasons. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Green, 411 U.S. 792, whereby upon the plaintiff's making a prima facie case of retaliation the burden shifts to the employer to demonstrate action was not in the nature of retaliation but made for legitimate business reasons. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:11 pm
The court also ordered Plaintiff’s counsel to pay $25,000 in attorney’s fees. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a Supreme Court's decision granting Plaintiff's petition challenging an arbitration award and remanding the matter for a new hearing before a different arbitrator. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a Supreme Court's decision granting Plaintiff's petition challenging an arbitration award and remanding the matter for a new hearing before a different arbitrator. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a Supreme Court's decision granting Plaintiff's petition challenging an arbitration award and remanding the matter for a new hearing before a different arbitrator. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a Supreme Court's decision granting Plaintiff's petition challenging an arbitration award and remanding the matter for a new hearing before a different arbitrator. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
As a result, [plaintiff's licensor] was not an exclusive licensee of the patent, and could not have granted an exclusive sublicense to [plaintiff]. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:31 am
Furman found federal question jurisdiction over the plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim which depended on the defendant's infringement of the plaintiff's patent. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
The defense filed a summary judgment asserting that the Plaintiff’s action was barred by the exculpatory waiver in the Plaintiff’s membership agreement. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:59 am
In granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment that its claims were not barred by prosecution laches, the court rejected defendant's argument that "plaintiff lacked a reasonable basis for filing the continuation application and therefore plaintiff must have intended to prejudice [defendant]. . . . [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:48 am
The court denied defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's willful infringement claim for failure to state a claim. [read post]
California’s High Court Authorizes Stay Of Non-Individual PAGA Claims During Pendency Of Arbitration
7 Aug 2023, 10:20 am
In Adolph, the plaintiff worked as a food delivery driver for the defendant’s Uber Eats platform. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
Rowland granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the defendant to include certain custodians in their email search, ordering the defendant to search emails of five additional custodians (including the Mayor of Chicago), but not requiring the defendant to search emails for an additional three custodians requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The plaintiffs brought a class action against Snapple Beverage Corporation, alleging that the defendant’s labeling of its teas and juice drinks as ‘All Natural’ was misleading to consumers because the beverages were sweetened with high fructose corn syrup (“HFCS”). [read post]
