Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Though later disparaged in the era of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:22 am
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Moreover, Congress cannot delegate power that it does not possess, such as the power to unilaterally impose its definition of marriage upon the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
By Eric Goldman Taylor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Krueger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
At that point, most states will probably continue to include Trump’s name on their general election ballots (especially if their state laws don’t authorize any exclusion, which might be true in the vast majority of states). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:05 am
Olsen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 am
It concerns, first, a seemingly rather esoteric question of statutory interpretation, namely whether the power under section 4 of the Fisheries Act 1981 to impose a levy in respect of sea fish and sea fish products “landed” in the UK extends to the imposition of a levy in respect of sea fish and sea fish products first brought to land elsewhere and then imported into the UK. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
“Lindke imagines that Freed can conjure the power of the State through his own efforts. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
On 7 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave judgment in seven linked cases, now known as W (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:31 pm
Case in point: Thomas Lapham v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:16 am
Against this background, our federal system presumptively preserves traditional state power to control what happens "in" or what is sent "into" states, and to protect state residents from what the state perceives as harms. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
See Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
See also Gay v. [read post]
