Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 6881 - 6900 of 41,391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
However, to this point, collective means of addressing the problem have been cut off.Two years ago, in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
It is now provided for by section 124 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, which states that such wills, once deposited, must be ‘open to inspection’. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:43 pm by Jennifer Lynch
The Minnesota Supreme Court is currently considering this argument in a case called State v. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
The right of abortion is one of the most contentious political and legal issues in the United States today. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court denied the application for injunctive relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:11 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States, denies to Congress or to the Treasury the power to default on our national bonds. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:48 am by Kevin Kaufman
The power to tax, as the court notes, is central to state governmental authority, a principle that has been affirmed by the Supreme Court going all the way back to Gibbons v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
These local efforts, in turn, have triggered a backlash, with a number of states enacting new laws to curb local powers and subject local elections officers to new restrictions, burdensome requirements, and penalties. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]