Search for: "State v. House"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 28,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 8:31 am
The justices questioned repeatedly whether they should get involved by extending the Civil Rights Act where many states have addressed this discrimination in state legislatures rather than the courts and where Congress has had numerous opportunities to intervene and chosen not to act, most recently in the Equality Act which passed the House, but has yet to be heard in the Senate. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:56 am
Gambling can be part of that revenue picture—but states shouldn’t bet the house on it. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:26 am
Reverse Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:28 am
I try my hand at explaining the DC Circuit's Net Neutrality ruling in Mozilla v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
With regard to the Collins petition, Seila Law states that the Supreme Court “routinely appoints amici in similar circumstances” and points to the willingness of the House to defend the judgment below. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Broadband mapping also continues to be a focus with a number of bills circulating in both the House and Senate. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Roberts’s outstanding work drew the attention of White House counsel Fred Fielding, who recruited Roberts to his staff in 1982. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Luton Borough Council v Altavon Luton Ltd & Ors (2019) EWHC 2415 (Admin) An appeal by way of case stated from a DJ’s decision at Luton Magistrates. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
The most recent assessment had merely stated that Ms E and her son might be disabled, when there was clear evidence that both were. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
That rate was clearly stated in the particulars of claim. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
