Search for: "State v. True"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 21,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2024, 3:14 am
Bladet Tromsø и Stensaas v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
By Eric Goldman Cammarata v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
This post was authored by Liara Silva and Alysha Stein-Manes Last month, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision in Caldecott v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:26 am
Ehret v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:46 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:08 pm
And as near as I can tell, the University of Texas-Austin undergraduate college, which is currently defending its affirmative action program before the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:25 am
In Rodolfo Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm
Chapman v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:35 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:17 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
1 May 2023, 1:04 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided to hear Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Reminiscent of Hana Financial Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:20 pm
Not Prosecutors in Virginia.In the State Of Virginia's relentless pursuit to execute a retarded man (See, Atkins v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:52 am
True, a special counsel has some independence from the attorney general. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
In Milkovich v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
See State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
However, the court "need not accept as true legal conclusions or unwarranted factual inferences. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:40 am
The same was true in the Stop the Beach Renourishment case, where the petitioner claimed the Florida Supreme Court changed the state law of accretion and erosion. [read post]
