Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
” In his dissent in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, Information Law & Policy Centre. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
He now entered the church and threw himself into his studies, becoming one of the outstanding theologians of his time, a man of immense, though not very original, learning. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
The U.S. study focused on Medicare patients and the British study was based on the total population living around Heathrow. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Germany v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
I accept the political science case for having a Constitution and court system, with the courts having a mandate, a la Marbury v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
United States – barring police from using a thermal-imaging device to look into a home Florida v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Samson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
SepperZubik v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
On January 20, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inSturgeon v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
New from Louisiana State University Press: Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:09 am
Franklin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:55 pm
The only Scalia quips that seem to have made it into a post were two he made during FCC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
