Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 6881 - 6900 of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 2:29 am by Jani Ihalainen
After lengthy discussions, the Court did agree that successful registration at the Copyright Office could offer prima facie, although rebuttable, protection and acceptance of copyright in a given work. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:59 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
This is what the framers of the Convention intended by the use of this word in this context. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:09 pm
[T]he Federal Circuit had implicitly upheld the use of the 25 percent rule prior to [Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This morning I've been reading the oral arguments (pdf)  from Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Summary of Decision issued December 14, 2007 [SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses "Universal Citation" and was given an "official" citation when issued. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:59 am
Summary of Decision issued August 3, 2007 [SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses "Universal Citation" and was given an "official" citation when issued. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Summary of Decision issued December 14, 2007 [SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses "Universal Citation" and was given an "official" citation when issued. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:56 am
" It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:08 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The second, is to use the Texas Department of Insurance web-site as a source of some information. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:48 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:12 pm
Like Jeralyn, mcjoan has a good analysis of the just released Al Haramein v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:46 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) According to this morning’s order list, the Supreme Court has agreed to review United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:47 am by admin
In the recent domain name dispute of Prime Pictures LLC v. [read post]