Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 23,712
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Facts: This case (Hobdy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In United States v Stitt, decided on December 10, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:30 am
After the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:14 am
Jonathan Ellis argued for the United States, and agreed with Wall-Street.com’s interpretation. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
Crucially, the National Emergencies Act places no restraints on what a president may declare as an emergency. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Here the state adopts an approach emblematic of private governance. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:36 am
Notably, the government’s argument echoes the argument by amici (including one of us) in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am
Importantly, the Report is the only publication of its kind in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
Four subjects were involved with planned attacks in the United States inspired by or in support of the Islamic State. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:55 pm
Friday, the first day of the FTC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:27 am
This Article takes that old adage head on, and does so through analysis of one of the most controversial cases ever decided by the United States Supreme Court: Roe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
United States, the justices declined to decide whether Apprendi applies to criminal restitution – here, an order requiring two men to pay over $300,000 in restitution to CitiGroup. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
Scott Stawski v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Khan v Orbis Business Intelligence Limited 20 September 2018, DC Superior Court (United States) A case which covered statements made by Christopher Steele, former MI6 officer, in a Fusion GPS dossier regarding three Russian oligarchs and their links to the Trump campaign. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
