Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 16,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 9:21 am
My law partners Sandra Poe (of Reed Smith's New York office) and Alicia Powell (from Pittsburgh), along with other colleagues, wrote the following summary of the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act of 2010. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:50 am
I am grateful to Michelle Smith de Bruin BL for preparing the following report on a recent reference from the Irish Supreme Court to the European Court of Justice. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:23 am
In Lee v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 1:53 pm
[ii]Smith, JR, 177. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:07 pm
Plate v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:11 pm
In LeCroy Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
As I noted in an earlier post, in the 1979 Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 2:26 pm
KSR v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
Smith (1990). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
JonesIn United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:45 am
Dist. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
In Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:09 pm
see also Fulton v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:38 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(a)(5) provides that a declarant is "unavailable" if he is absent from the hearing and the proponent of a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception... [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm
A defendant is charged with murder. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. [read post]
23 May 2010, 9:21 am
Like its federal counterpart, Kentucky Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten (10) years has elapsed since the date of the conviction unless the... [read post]
