Search for: "Andrews v. Andrews" Results 6901 - 6920 of 7,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Andrew Bridges, Fenwick & West LLP (on the other side of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
I have finally finished reading the Mueller Report, slowly and with care. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
Last spring, I did a post – Trojan Horse Warrant – Fail? [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
The revelations came in a hearing in the case of  Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and others - naming suspended Sheriff Peter Watson amid a series of allegations in relation to the £400m collapse of the Heather Capital Hedge Fund. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am by Peter A. Mahler
Some nine years ago I wrote about an LLC dissolution case titled Goldstein v Pikus decided by former Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles Ramos which also involved a bitter dispute between two estranged co-managing members of a realty-holding LLC. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 7:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The prior Delaware case on which Judge Adams principally relied was the August 2022 decision in Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
For example, in the Cape Intermediate Holdings v Dring case decided in 2019, the UKSC recommended that the relevant bodies consider the issue of (non—party) public access to court documents. [read post]