Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 6901 - 6920 of 191,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court examined the legislative history behind the UK’s system of national insurance, which showed that NICs have indeed been levied on a basis that is different from the “emoluments” on which income tax has been raised. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
This moggy has been kept busy over the last 24 hours with matters of partiality at the EPO, Swiss form claims, and Bolar exemption in UK and under unitary patent, and then, no sooner was he thinking of emerging from the deluge, fellow Kat Annsley kindly drew his attention to the eagerly awaited substantive decision in the case of Actavis v Lilly (as we shall call it for short - you may wish to call it Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As Plaintiff's breach of contract claims  "... were litigated, or could have been litigated in his Education Law §3020-a hearing or his proceeding to vacate the arbitration award," the Appellate Division ruled that the claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As Plaintiff's breach of contract claims  "... were litigated, or could have been litigated in his Education Law §3020-a hearing or his proceeding to vacate the arbitration award," the Appellate Division ruled that the claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:24 pm
The plaintiff testified that she drove away believing that her husband, who had been removed from the car, had been, or would be, arrested. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am by Shea Denning
Even when the door has been opened, the trial court may exclude responsive evidence under N.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 2:11 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its opinion in the case of Bresee v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:02 am by sally
However that meaning was not the legal basis for the national court to order an air carrier to reimburse to passengers whose flight had been delayed or cancelled the expenses the latter had incurred because of the failure of that carrier to fulfil its obligations to assist and provide care under articles 8 and 9 of the Regulation.” WLR Daily, 13th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:13 am by sally
” WLR Daily, 21st May 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:57 am by sally
Interflora Inc and another v Marks & Spencer plc (Case C-323/09); [2011] WLR (D) 281 “Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC and article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark was to be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark was entitled to prevent a competitor from advertising on the basis of a keyword which was identical with the trade mark and which had been selected in an internet referencing service… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:14 am by sally
” WLR Daily, 1st December 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]