Search for: "California v. Law" Results 6901 - 6920 of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 2:22 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On May 10, 2011, the Second Appellate District of California issued a favorable decision for employers in Flores v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:18 am
(California law defines grand theft to include any theft “[w]hen the property is taken from the person of another. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:10 pm by Sahara Pynes
California law has declared void “every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am by David Urban
  As you would expect, the California Supreme Court generally decides issues of state law and the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
A district court may grant judgment as a matter of law, Judge Koh said, "when the evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion and the conclusion is contrary to that reached by the jury" (Ostad v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 11:50 pm
I’ve had a lot of request for the concluding points I made about what employers should do while we are waiting for the California Supreme Court to determine whether or not it will review the Brinker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(I’m also pretty sure that no one is legally going into San Francisco “armed to the teeth”; even the most law-abiding Californians are generally not allowed to do that.) [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm by Anonymous
This is the second post in my series on the July 2011 California Bar Exam. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:03 am by Oliver Yee and Kelsey Cropper
AB 5, which went into effect January 1, 2020, codified in the Labor Code the “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status that the California Supreme Court adopted in its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 2:16 pm
The California bar examination starts tomorrow. [read post]
  In short, had this employer followed more scrupulously the admonitions of the California Supreme Court (see, Armendariz v. [read post]