Search for: "Call v. Heard" Results 6901 - 6920 of 8,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
The circumvention devices consist of the SX Pro, which comprises a USB dongle and a jig tool, together with software called SX OS. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm by Marie-Amélie George
In 2015, when he heard the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
I told them I'd focus on three areas: Available data on prosecutors (focused on Texas), innocence issues, and context for covering so-called "progressive prosecutors. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Last summer both Apple and Google's Motorola appealed Judge Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:16 am by Tian Lu
In 2014, the Supreme Court of China ('the SPC') heard a copyright case: Huagai Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am by Ben
But the new opinion relies on the fact that prior to 1972, it was only sheet music that was covered under copyright and audio recording need not be heard by the jury to find out whether there was an infringement or not. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
First, as is well known, the Court is about to rule on the question it had declined to take on in Buffington—namely, the fate of Chevron deference—in a case called Loper Bright Enterprises, set to be heard later this Term. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 12:36 pm by The Legal Blog
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties before us. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Appellate deference is justified to a significant extent on the accepted wisdom that trial judges and juries have an advantage over appeal judges in assessing factual questions because they, unlike appeal judges, have seen and heard the witnesses: R. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
The basics of that process at the heart of the common law system, in contemporary language, include notice, an opportunity to be heard, consistency, predictability and appeal to ensure accountability. [read post]