Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6901 - 6920 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Sutherland LNG
Premier Christy Clark and Tan Sri Dato’ Shamsul Azhar Abbas, Group CEO and President of Malaysian state oil company Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas), signed a Letter of Intent to work collaboratively to secure long-term investments by Petronas in an LNG terminal in B.C. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:46 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
(d/b/a Yaucono Coffee and other coffee brands) to a sister company of Coca Cola. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:49 pm by Irene Ten Cate
  Indeed, David Marburger, the attorney who took the deposition in the lawsuit against the Cuyahoga County Recorder’s Office, maintains in a comment submitted to the New York Times that his questioning style was dramatically different: The video is hard to watch b/c it is so unlike th[e] actual atmosphere, which the transcript can’t convey. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:46 am by Green and Associates
” It contains information on:(1) utilization; (2) payment (allowed amount and Medicare payment); and (3) submitted charges.It is organized by (a) National Provider Identifier (NPI), (b) Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code, and (c) place of service. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:33 am by David J.B. Froiland
There may not be a one-size-fits-all answer that is applicable in all situations, given the different risk tolerances and other interests that various companies may have, but all employers would do well to reevaluate their separation agreements with these considerations in mind. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:08 am by David Clark
As noted in the press release accompanying the bill, the so-called “Defend Trade Secrets Act would empower companies to protect their trade secrets in federal court. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:08 am by David Clark
As noted in the press release accompanying the bill, the so-called “Defend Trade Secrets Act would empower companies to protect their trade secrets in federal court. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:08 am by David J. Clark
As noted in the press release accompanying the bill, the so-called “Defend Trade Secrets Act would empower companies to protect their trade secrets in federal court. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:23 am by Seth Hanft
 At issue in Cultrona was whether the participant was entitled to statutory penalties under ERISA Section 502(c)(1)(B), which gives courts discretion to penalize plan administrators up to $110 per day if they fail to provide certain plan-related documents within 30 days of receiving a written request. [read post]
4 May 2014, 7:00 am by Jennifer Williams
To what extent would sanctions be (a) legal, (b) feasible, and (c) desirable? [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:00 pm by Ron Coleman
In part one of this post I laid out the following propositions:  (a) We operate in a common-law system, so want and expect judges to apply the law to new factual situations; (b) intellectual property law is — as the Aereo case demonstrates — the very fount of new factual situations in our time; (c) lawyers try to navigate this system on behalf of clients but often find themselves or their clients being accused of cynical manipulation of the law for doing so; and… [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:54 am by Joy Waltemath
The court, however, denied class certification as to a second “tools class” (Tokoshima v The Pep Boys – Manny Moe & Jack of California, April 28, 2014, Breyer, C). [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:48 am by Dan Harris
(See Article 41 of the Rules and Regulations.) c)    Vacation. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:44 pm by admin
In sum, while the above is not intended to be exhaustive, a lot of the CASL compliance exercise is related to: (a) obtaining CASL compliant consents; (b) ensuring that consent requests and electronic marketing complies with the “form” requirements of CASL; (c) including an unsubscribe mechanism; and (d) keeping track of unsubscribes and electronic marketing lists. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:25 am
 As IPKat readers will probably know and as Wikipedia explains, this annual report first published in 1989 [see here for last year's one] identifies trade barriers to US companies and products due to IP laws in other countries, and - among other things - includes a list of countries which do not provide "adequate and effective" [Merpel knows that there are things that are effective but may not be adequate, yet wonders whether also the other way around is… [read post]