Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 16,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
At least one competitor, H&R Block, does require federal e-file acceptance prior to transmitting the state e-file return. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
Consequently the spray gun according to claim 1 was distinguished from the known spray guns by the characterising features of claim 1 (features (h) and (i)) and thus novel. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:51 pm
Even if the Biden administration does not act, we remain hopeful that the court will issue a preliminary injunction to help resolve these issues. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
CDS does not attempt to disguise the true, and improper, rationale behind its differential treatment of girls, which plainly does not serve an important governmental interest. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
Altogether, the evidence tells a story that does not match the explanation the Secretary gave for his decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:46 pm
But their claimed injury does not stem from the Interim Estimates themselves, it stems from any forthcoming, speculative, and unknown regulation that may place increased burdens on them and may result from consideration of SC-GHG. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:56 am
The majority does not even attempt to explain why a court has the authority to scrutinize an agency's policy reasons for rescinding an unlawful program under the arbitrary and capricious microscope. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:53 am
The process of any of claims 1 to 8, wherein in (b), the zeolitic material is treated with the liquid aqueous system for a period in the range of from 0.5 h to 24 h, preferably from 1 h to 18 h, more preferably from 6 h to 10 h. 11. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 1:18 pm
And the preliminary posture of the litigation does not absolve the government of its burden. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:50 pm
See H & M Commercial Driver Leasing, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:10 pm
At the core of our conclusion is this: E.O. 13990 does not require any action from federal agencies. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:54 am
However, an individual citizen does not have standing to challenge whether another individual is qualified to hold public office. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
It does not preempt states from exercising such authority on their own. [read post]
[Jonathan H. Adler] What happens when the Justice Department files a brief against a federal agency?
18 Mar 2017, 8:26 am
What does this mean? [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:14 pm
The former President's executive privilege claim here is particularly weak, given both the subject matter of the material sought and the current President's conclusion that executive privilege does not and should not bar the release of these documents. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
In addition to state court experience, there are other types of experience that are also conspicuously lacking from the Court, such as trial-level criminal defense work, and this sort of diversity matters for how the Court does its work. [read post]
5 May 2020, 8:04 am
—9/6/18 BREAKING: District Court Judge in Texas Holds ACA Is Unlawful—12/14/18 What the Lawless Obamacare Ruling Means (w/ Abbe Gluck), New York Times, 12/15/18 Understanding Why Judge O'Connor Was Wrong to Conclude Plaintiffs Had Standing to Challenge the Penalty-Less Individual Mandate—12/21/18 Court Stays Ruling Invalidating the Affordable Care Act Pending Appeal—12/31/18 Justice Department Revises Its Position in Texas ACA Case—3/25/19 Does… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:00 pm
The Biden Administration does not want the validity of the ACA floating in doubt for the next three years. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:32 pm
That Twitter is not required to provide a robust forum for divergent views and perspectives does not mean it should not do so. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:49 am
In this case, it does. [read post]
