Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2009, 12:01 am
See Geisha LLC. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
Naturally, the judge’s explicit ban of publication of information on Twitter and Facebook attracted a lot of attention on those platforms; and technology bloggers, as well as the mainstream press, were quick to report this apparent legal first for the English courts. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
I must, of course, leave this rather long post with a bit of Shakespeare - Henry V: O noble English! [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
19 May 2020, 7:58 pm
The court stated that “undoubtedly, . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:56 am
v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Due to shipping considerations, only United States addresses, please. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
(And I think Karen's work on Flemming v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 1:17 pm
Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” Perkins v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
Chapter V Legal Responsibilities; Articles 53-69Provisions sketching out penalties are included (Articles 53-55; 60-65). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm
And, the question of whether an officer must provide a driver the opportunity to speak with counsel, even when requesting a test outside of Minnesota’s Implied Consent statutory scheme that carries various civil penalties, is currently under review by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Chris v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
If 10% or more of the workforce at any employer facility speak a language other than English as their spoken language, employers must translate the prevention policies into each relevant language. (2 C.C.R. 11023(d)). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
