Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 11,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
The fracas that occurred when COPE was established indicates some expected difficulties with that process - see Tune in live for ANC v COPE name battle. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
"This is a heartfelt plea to English matrimonial solicitors - please, please, be less polite. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:53 am
Comm. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
MXB v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 3279 (QB) - Mr Justice Tugendhat updates his own guidance on child anonymity orders in social media age. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Hollister appealed arguing that the sum calculated under the normal basis under English law should not have been deducted. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm
OFT report also reminded me of another recent Canadian case, Direct Energy Marketing Limited v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
Wilkinson v London Strategic Health Authority is an interesting decision on the entitlement to copyright in training materials which has been sitting for too long in the IPKat's in-tray -- but you can read about it now thanks to Mark Anderson's to-the-point dissection of the issues on IP Draughts. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
For starters, there is no doubt, based on a reading of Securicor and the rich jurisprudence of the English courts on the issue of contractual interpretation (the latest addition to which is Campbell v Daejan Properties), that when interpreting a contract the intention of the parties reign supreme, and blanket rules are to be avoided. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
In line with the decision of His Honour Judge Horowitz QC in H v S [2011] EWHC B23 (Fam) which I respectfully follow, the talaq is entitled to be recognised as valid in England and Wales. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA);(iii) State/Local… [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:33 am
V. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
In Schenck v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
Palmer’s comprehensive English translation of colonial Louisiana’s Code Noir of 1724 will be particularly useful to researchers. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:38 am
After the House of Lords decisions in Suisse Atlantique and Photo Production v Securicor, the settled position is that English law treats all breaches of contract equally, and there is no difference between a ‘serious’ or ‘fundamental’ breach of contract and an ‘ordinary’ or ‘non-fundamental’ breach of contract. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 3:47 pm
In Fairstar Heavy Transport N.V. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
That year, the English case of Krell v. [read post]
