Search for: "High v State"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 7:59 am
The Colorado Court of Appeals, in Crocker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:19 am
The collection consists of more than 90,000 cases involving violations of Titles II, III and V of the ADA, as well as claims under disability rights laws in states that Lex Machina covers. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
The United States Supreme Court decided yesterday a malicious prosecution/RICO case with a Fourth and Fifth Amendment implication yesterday: Wilkie v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:28 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
The appeals court is expected to decide Louboutin v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:52 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
While this bar may end up being high, the decision is certainly going to prove to be a helpful step towards clarifying what is required by a data subject when making an erasure request. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:37 am
Defendants believe that no more than a 4:1 or 9:1 ratio will survive judicial scrutiny based on the court's prior decison in State Farm v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Marshall v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 am
In Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
There was another attempt in 1999 with Ortiz v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court recalled its judgment in State of MP v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:21 am
Bd. of Governors of State Colls. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:05 am
[Federalist Society podcast with Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Supreme Court case of Packingham v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:01 am
”… The Ninth Circuit will hear Askins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:17 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:05 am
” [City of South Bend v. [read post]
