Search for: "High v State"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 35,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm
The Casa de Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Dep’t of Labor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:35 am
LebanonNidaa Al Watan Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
The High Court referred questions concerning the application of EU law to the CJEU. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
On the other, some would argue that it creates too high a bar if it lets platforms leave up highly damaging material that we think they should be able to recognize as illegal without waiting for a court to act. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:34 pm
The Real Property Transfer Tax Ordinance does not define “realty sold,” but states that the scope of “realty” is determined by the definition or scope of the term under state law. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
Today’s judgment provides just that, firmly endorsing the substance of the concerns expressed by the DPC (and by the Irish High Court) to the effect that EU citizens do not enjoy the level of protection demanded by EU law when their data is transferred to the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The Irish High Court referred the question to the Court of Justice and it is the outcome in this ruling that we see today. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:05 pm
State, 781 A.2d 913 (Md. 2001), so maybe it's time for me to write another one. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
Now, probably more than ever, a particular focus should be put on the data exporter’s evaluation of the legal developments in the recipient state. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
Kennelly's decision Monday in A.J. v. [read post]
