Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 19,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 3:36 am
[see cited cases].To be clear, Trademark Rules 2.106(b)(3)(i) and 2.114(b)(3)(i) do not require that, after a defendant’s initial answer, amendment to add an omitted compulsory counterclaim must be denied where the movant has not demonstrated that the counterclaim is based on newly-acquired evidence.* * * * * * * * The rules require compulsory counterclaims to be pleaded in the answer, if known, but under Fed. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:09 am
The owners of Flat A, whose tenants may be a couple of responsible, recycling obsessives or the owner of Flat B, housing a bunch of students who still think their mum magically pops in when they are asleep and cleans up?. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 7:44 am
Judge Michael T. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The case was brought by William B. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 pm
Had the railways remained in public ownership, of course, the matter would never have arisen. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
§ 1332(d)(11)(B)(i). [5] Pub. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
§ 1332(d)(11)(B)(i). [5] Pub. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 6:08 am
Frye (University of Central Florida) and Duong T. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 3:51 am
The holding is pretty simple: an inventor who signs an employment agreement that provides (a) she “will assign” rights to inventions doesn’t then assign them; (b) that she “holds in trust” those rights doesn’t mean she assigns them; and (c) that she “quit claims” those rights doesn’t mean she assigns them. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am
Sessions 17-459 Issue: Whether, to trigger the stop-time rule by serving a “notice to appear,” the government must “specify” the items listed in the definition of a “notice to appear,” including “[t]he time and place at which the proceedings will be held. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 2:55 am
Don’t be afraid to exercise them. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:04 pm
The exemptions under Rules 506(b) and (c) share several characteristics. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:04 pm
The exemptions under Rules 506(b) and (c) share several characteristics. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
As hard as it is to believe, after all that blather, there are five more relists I haven’t even covered yet. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:53 am
It doesn’t matter if you legally bought some marijuana over in Colorado. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 1:59 am
If so, wasn't the entire analysis of English law by the court in Inox Wind an unnecessary exercise? [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm
If you really don't have to "wing it", don't. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:36 pm
In fact, it wasn't until 18 months after Martinez that he moved for Rule 60(b)(6) relief. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:03 am
The IRS doesn’t require third-party reporting for virtual currency (yet) so there’s no form 1099-B or equivalent issued at the end of the tax year. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:53 am
As a matter of formal legal analysis, the main point here is that the state and local income tax liability doesn't actually exist until one fully applies the pertinent law. [read post]
