Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2007, 5:52 pm
I, sec. 8). [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:22 pm
It would show that the military rulers were above the law - subject to none of the restraints that marked the rule-of-law state. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:32 pm
But I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:43 pm
Other posts on IPBiz:http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/03/park-fulminating-on-fusion-but-what.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/03/more-about-congress-reviewing-purdue.html**Separately, from californiastemcellreportLawrence Ebert has posted the following question:"Of the procedure on grants given by CIRM, I was wondering "who" has the authority to conduct oversight. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:49 am
Mark-to-Market (or M2M). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:46 am
(It is/was marked up in the House Appropriations Committee today.) [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:09 am
I have already argued at great length that the IRS should reform e-filing so that there is one government-provided portal that is simple and free for all taxpayers to use. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Yet, as we mark the fourth anniversary of the war, the story of the 110th Congress still seems to be one of an opposition party struggling to come to grips with its authority to upend a President's misguided policies. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:32 am
The TTAB found 12TH BEAR likely to cause confusion with the marks BEARS and CHICAGO BEARS. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
I'll explain why I think so on the other side. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:42 pm
But, enough of what I think. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 1:06 pm
[March 14 update: Mark I has another post from this afternoon.] [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:07 am
Porkbuster's Alert from Mark Tapscott Looks Like Bush Has Caved on EarmarksWhen I heard last week from Hill sources that the White House congressional liason staff was pressuring OMB Director Rob Portman to not release all of the earmarks requested by Members of Congress to executive agencies under the FY2005 budget, I called the OMB press office.When I asked for a copy of the earmark database and copies of all correspondence between OMB and… [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 6:05 am
Mark Pryor, a former state attorney general from Arkansas, and Republican Sen. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 1:26 pm
I didn't mean this as anything other than a description with the audiences I was addressing, although it had a prescriptive point - it is a mistake to get all worked up over the profound changes a new Congress and new Democratic administration might make. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:59 am
Though, after spending 30 minutes last night describing the problem to my wife, I sure wish we had called it ‘the future of finding stuff online.' I'm headed out this morning for a meeting convened by the Library of Congress's working group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:36 pm
For that reason, the Times editorial, although a worthwhile attempt to flag a serious potential issue, misses the mark. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:13 am
Photo: Mark Jones [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Cooper, Professor, Mark O. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:50 am
I can see trademark infringement if the phones weren't properly marked as varying from original condition, but erasing, removing, and disabling software doesn't, as far as I know, implicate any exclusive rights of a copyright owner, any more than my recycling of my old newspapers does. [read post]
