Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2021, 11:03 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 3:30 pm
From Bartholomew-Woods v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 6:18 pm
SUMMARY: On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (D.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
The prejudgment interest rate was lowered to the United States Treasury Bill rate. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:48 pm
Sleepy’s argued that plaintiffs’ status as employees should be decided under the “right to control” test applied by to ERISA claims by the United States Supreme Court in Nationwide Mutual Ins. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
In a case on review from any court of the United States, as defined by 28 U. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:35 am
Stoneridge v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
We should know in a week or two whether this petition will have legs. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
By their decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
And while the union responded that the NLRA forbids it — the NLRB will not process a representation petition seeking a “members only” bargaining unit, and a union has no recourse if the employer refuses to bargain — that was of no concern to the state high court. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
” The Court has likely now released any petitions it was holding for Boyer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am
This subsection’s language permits return to “contiguous” countries that share a border with the United States. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:36 am
Here, however, he's himself presiding over a Conversant v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:58 pm
They are eligible to petition for a green card without a break in their stay and employment in the United States. [read post]
