Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 6901 - 6920 of 41,391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
  The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
When contacted by CNN about Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
These sorts of zoning ordinances shift the balance of power in these disputes, giving universities unwarranted power beyond their walls. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Another, indirect, pathway focuses on the support of key stakeholders to whom human rights related work has been given (by the state) or taken (in the absence of delegation). [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Texas passed even more restrictions on abortion providers, which were struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2016 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:45 pm by Emily Dai
Stewart Baker shared an episode of The Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring interviews with Jordan Schneider to discuss recent Beijing tech policy, Michael Weiner to unpack FTC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]