Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 6901 - 6920 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
” Parole in place allows noncitizens who enter the United States without authorization to remain for a specific period of time. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor would have granted cert., but came up two votes short. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:10 am by WSLL
After a short chase, the detective caught up with the passenger and was eventually assisted by the other detective. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
The Court stated that changing the “allocation of power between a state and its subdivisions requires at least a clear statement in the authorizing federal legislation” and that the Telecommunications Act of 1996, on which the FCC relied for its preemption authority, fell short of that requirement. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
” Sometimes, she even seems to caricature these arguments—which is unusual for her, as her scholarship is generally remarkably nuanced (and brilliant).In terms of sources, I will discuss primarily a short passage in Kagan’s first article and Kagan’s argument in Citizens United, as well as their relation to the longer passage in Kagan’s scholarship that I discussed in my previous post. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am by David Urban
  (The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States, 122 Yale Law Journal 522, 547-48 (2012).] [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm by David Lat
In short, BAR/BRI seems like a money-making machine. [read post]