Search for: "State v House" Results 6901 - 6920 of 28,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Franks’ book was going to press, the Supreme Court granted cert in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “In a major shift in United States military policy in Syria, the White House said on Sunday that President Trump had given his endorsement for a Turkish military operation that would sweep away American-backed Kurdish forces near the border in Syria. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, 802 F.Supp. 490, 504 (D.D.C. 1992) vacated on other grounds by Hastings v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
We could only resist the attacks of the state. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Article I of the Constitution mandates states to hold popular elections to select House members and now (since the Seventeenth Amendment) also for United States Senators. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:31 am by Tim Zubizarreta
The justices questioned repeatedly whether they should get involved by extending the Civil Rights Act where many states have addressed this discrimination in state legislatures rather than the courts and where Congress has had numerous opportunities to intervene and chosen not to act, most recently in the Equality Act which passed the House, but has yet to be heard in the Senate. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:56 am by Kevin Kaufman
Gambling can be part of that revenue picture—but states shouldn’t bet the house on it. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:28 am by Stewart Baker
  I try my hand at explaining the DC Circuit's Net Neutrality ruling in Mozilla v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Larissa Morgan
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm by Ronald Mann
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:52 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  With regard to the Collins petition, Seila Law states that the Supreme Court “routinely appoints amici in similar circumstances” and points to the willingness of the House to defend the judgment below. [read post]