Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 6901 - 6920
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 7:20 am
If an agency issued an order that lacked the necessary quantity of evidence required by § 7(c), its order would still reviewable under § 10(e)(B)(1) (holding unlawful agency action “not in accordance with law”) even if it may escape meaningful review under § 10(e)(B)(5) (supported by substantial evidence). [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:52 pm
(c)(1)(i), an absence between 6 months and 1 year from the United States raises a rebuttable presumption that continuity of residence has been interrupted. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
N.J.S.A. 2A:34-62(c). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
B. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
The Rule was dramatically amended in 1975 in response to the Supreme Court’s 1969 landmark decision in Boykin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:03 am
In Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
In New Jersey, an appellate panel in Denike v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
The Department of Belatedly Blogged Interesting Niceties (DOBBIN) has finally got round to writing up Data Marketing and & Secretarial Ltd and Winning Deals Ltd v S & S Enterprises Ltd and Selective Marketplace Ltd [2014] EWHC 1499 (IPEC), a ruling of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Judge Hacon) for England and Wales way back on 16 May 2014, when this Kat's head was still full of the INTA Meeting in Hong Kong. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am
Nealon noted that Erie's forum selection clause had been previously upheld as valid by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the separate case of O'Hara v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Robinson , No. 075474 Conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the district court erroneously instructed the jury to determine the quantity of cocaine "involved in the conspiracy" instead of the quantity individually attributable to defendant; 2) the district court failed to charge a violation of 21 U.S.C. section 841(b)(1)(C) as a lesser-included offense; 3) the evidence was insufficient to prove… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
Katie-Leigh Webb-Harnden v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2023) EWCA Civ 992 This was the second appeal from a review decision upholding the suitability of an offer of a private sector tenancy in Walsall in discharge of Waltham Forest’s s.193 duty to Ms Webb-Harden. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
Nonetheless there are some important aspects of the decision, UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
DETLOR v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
B. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Stated differently, each settlement reaches farther than a cure based on rewording a label or an ad—effectively eliminating an entire channel of competitive advertising at the key moment when the consumer is considering a purchase. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:09 am
This memorandum establishes and clarifies additional authority and responsibilities of the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) in connection with the National Manager responsibilities for NSS assigned to the Director of the NSA by National Security Directive 42 of July 5, 1990 (National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems) (NSD-42), Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended (United States Intelligence… [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:09 am
This memorandum establishes and clarifies additional authority and responsibilities of the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) in connection with the National Manager responsibilities for NSS assigned to the Director of the NSA by National Security Directive 42 of July 5, 1990 (National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems) (NSD-42), Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended (United States Intelligence… [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:06 pm
Seto and Friends of He ‘eia State Park et. al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
