Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 5:47 pm
This editorial, also in today's New York Times, encourages Congress to undo the Ledbetter decision and states that "in addition to interpreting the statute unreasonably and ignoring the relevant precedents, the majority blinded itself to the realities of the workplace. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:54 pm
., asking it to review the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in Spoerle v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
"Until Congress passes an overriding federal statute, American domestic courts are not going to give an international tribunal decisions the effect of overriding state laws. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
I have argued that the immunity grant appears constitutionally valid, at least as to a challenge under United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:53 am
Yates v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:46 am
ERISA preempts any state law causes of action that "relate to" an ERISA plan, because Congress has determined that employee benefit plans need uniform administration. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:19 am
Pappert (pdf, pp. 77-79) and its reliance on the Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:53 am
In short, Congress enacted the FAAAA to “prevent States from undermining federal regulation of interstate trucking through a patchwork of state regulations. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
However, in North Carolina v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Holder Docket: 10-545 Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
Yesterday the court held unanimously in Cyan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
The original challenges, citing Section 3, were filed in state court. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:07 pm
They asked why the IRS seems to be ignoring that 2010 decision—United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:16 am
The reason for this is the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021.The case is Johnson v., Everyrealm, Inc., 22 Civ. 6669, 2022 WL 2216173 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
(“the discovery rule is to be applied in all federal question cases in the absence of a contrary directive from Congress. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
He was counsel of record for the 30 amicus states in Davila v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
” In making that plea, the government lawyers had relied upon a sweeping statement by the Court, in the 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:59 am
In Kappos v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
