Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
This is not to say that the brand holder may not have suffered harm. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
How should we think about the disadvantage that holders of idiosyncratic beliefs face under P2? [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:39 pm
The Federal Circuit adopted Judge Posner's claim construction of this patent in Apple v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:06 am
Long Eminent Scholars Academic Chair, Louisiana State University (LSU) Paul M. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:55 am
Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:16 am
This puzzling question landed on the CJEU's desk late last month, which sets an interesting precedent for future infringement cases.The case of Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Limited v Duma Forklifts NV concerns the sale of Mitsubishi forklifts, for which Mitsubishi's European arm has the exclusive rights to. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
Luckily the CJEU took this question on and handed down its judgment only a few weeks ago.The case of Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck concerned a manuscript written by a German politician, Volker Beck. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:14 pm
Apple's petition mentions that two months after the Galaxy Nexus decision, another Federal Circuit panel issued a more injunction-friendly ruling in a different IT patent case (Presidio Components, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:10 pm
We are disappointed in the decision in Golan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
It has a licensing department, and an annual litigation budget in the billions of dollars (an Optis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:38 am
The Certificate stated that the SPC would have a term of just under 3 years, expiring in January 2022, subject to the payment of the appropriate fees. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am
The second panel featured four law professors talking about the current state of the law. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:35 pm
In today’s decision in Generics (UK) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
It lamented what it perceived to have been the decline in the state of the decorative arts as well as the conditions in which production and manufacture took place. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
Instead, the sole ability of the sign to individualise the goods of the IR holder in relation to those offered by its competitors is decisive. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
However, some countries have provisions that deal specifically with the inability of a trade mark owner to succeed in infringement proceedings against the holder of even a later trade mark if it happens to be registered. [read post]
