Search for: "State v. Keis"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 22,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm
I learned so much from his earlier work in preparing my history of Buckley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:14 am
Brudney (Ohio State University College of Law) has posted Below the Surface: Comparing Legislative History Usage by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court on SSRN. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Mitchell-Tracey v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am
The full background to the case can be found elsewhere, but for present purposes the key facts are as follows. [read post]
Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation–RBC Bearings v. Caliber
18 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
In 2012, a key employee made the switch, so the plaintiff sued, and some ancillary lawsuits followed. [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In Bunt v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:47 am
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
In Rales v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
It was a misdirection to say one needed to broadly compensate each individual. 1209: Ms Demetriou QC says it is clear that the Tribunal saw there as being a governing principle that individual claimants must be restored to position they would have been in but for the infringement, which is wrong as a matter of statutory construction. 1202: Ms Demetriou QC states that the compensatory principle is not irrelevant at distribution stage, but it is not a statutory requirement. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
As the Chaidez majority observed, the key legal issue is whether Padilla announced a new rule, or merely provided an application of the established principles of ineffective assistance from Strickland v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
As the Chaidez majority observed, the key legal issue is whether Padilla announced a new rule, or merely represented an application of the established principles of ineffective assistance from Strickland v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 9:06 am
See O’Bryan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
That trend began with the Supreme Court’s decision last Term (United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
What are states going to do? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm
” The key part of this response is “on this point, as Prof. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:31 am
Specifically, the Court in Wachocki v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
There are increasing calls for States and business to step up action, including for States to negotiate a legally binding instrument. [read post]
