Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 173,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2023, 11:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:13 am
Grand Jury Subpoena decision, which stated that, under the Uniform Law, the requesting state must make any privilege determinations. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 8:26 am
Wood noted that, under the precedent of the Supreme Court case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
In support thereof, Claimant states as follows: This Motion seeks a summary final order finding that John Jones, M.D. is authorized by operation of law. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
The case could set up a major test for gun rights for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 10:28 am
” D.C. v. [read post]
Tanner Allread on SCOTUS’ Improper Use of Indian Removal Era Analysis in Modern Day Indian Law Cases
4 Nov 2023, 8:43 am
Castro-Huerta, the Supreme Court departed from one of the foundational cases in federal Indian law, Worcester v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
In advance of the Sporting Chance Forum, part of the United Nations’ yearlongcommemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders call on States, international sports associations, sportspersons, and other stakeholders to protect and respect international human rights law and standards in the field of sports, without discrimination of any kind. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:02 am
The Mavrick Law Firm represents businesses and their owners in breach of contract litigation and related claims of fraud, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am
Decisions this Week United StatesPennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
bill_id=202320240SB699 [3] Edwards v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
First, this authority will allow the Commission to protect consumers, including by issuing straightforward, clear rules to prevent Internet service providers from engaging in practices harmful to consumers, competition, and public safety, and by establishing a uniform, national regulatory approach rather than disparate requirements that vary state-by-state. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:46 pm
In yesterday's Reyes v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm
Moore v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:03 pm
, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Erwin Switzer, Alison Eggers, and Kirsten Ahmad, eds., State Consumer Protection Law (2022). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
See TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
See TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:58 pm
A law school professor could teach about Roe v. [read post]
