Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 19,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 4:13 pm
In Scriro v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:43 pm
In a majority decision written by Justice Stevens, the court held that in cases where the consequences of a guilty plea are "clear and succinct," a lawyer must explain them to the defendant. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
My initial thought was that, maybe, the OC justices were simply busy, so as an administrative matter, maybe some cases were thrown down to SD. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:50 am
In the new case, Dunn v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:25 am
Sylla Bangaly v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:25 am
And this malady means that even when the agencies completely fail to follow the court's previous orders, they still get a pass to keep spying. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:35 am
Expectations of privacy in sent messages, the Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
A.B.C. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:06 pm
But despite the precedent of Lincoln, Jefferson and Roosevelt, Gingrich still faces the seemingly insurmountable argument of the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm
In Johnson [v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm
In Johnson [v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 3:34 pm
Circuit Court panel, in a detainee case titled Al Ginco v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
Consider Justice Scalia’s argument in his concurrence (joined by Justice Thomas) to Sosa v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
Court-watchers continue to parse Wednesday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm
Fran Unsworth told Mr Justice Mann at a High Court trial in London that the BBC had a responsibility to report but also to be sensitive. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
” she asks, [p. 129] referring to the years in the early 1990s following the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
Jennifer Granholm (pictured) hopes the Supreme Court’s conservative justices can get up-to-speed on how the health insurance market works, and consider how invalidating the landmark law will impact the lives of tens of millions of Americans who do not have the luxuries the high court justices enjoy. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:31 pm
" Justice Richard Sanders wrote for the court's plurality...Bless your libertarian heart, Justice Sanders. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:41 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) has today given its decision in the case of USDAW and others – v – Ethel Austin and others, otherwise known as the Woolworths case. [read post]
