Search for: "UNited States v. White" Results 6901 - 6920 of 7,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 3:18 pm
United States Leaves More Open Than it Answers PRIMARY MATERIALS Sentencing Memoranda Submitted in US v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
(That is not a reason to think that Brown was a mistake: it is simply a consequence of how judicial protection of controversial rights claims usually works in the United States.).Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 524 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 1987)...................................................................................................8 White v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 524 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 1987)...................................................................................................8 White v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:50 am
United States, 487 U.S. 533, 108 S.Ct. 2529, 101 L.Ed.2d 472 (1988) (finding illegally seized evidence admissible where the same evidence was subject to government subpoena); Nix v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 2:20 pm
Cruz is currently the Solicitor General of Texas and recently argued Medellin for the State of Texas before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:57 pm
Ted Cruz is currently the Solicitor General of Texas and recently argued Medellin for the State of Texas before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
This morning the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals released an opinion in Al-Haramain Islamic v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]