Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
In The Patissier LLP v Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd [2019] SGIPOS 10, the Applicant (The Patissier LLP) sought to revoke the mark(“Subject Mark”) registered in the name Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd, on the ground of non-use under S 22(1)(a) and (b) of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”). [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Meese v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
HMRC’s contention was that Mr Haworth’s arrangements, as described above, were, in all material respects the same as those used by the taxpayer in HM Revenue and Customs v Smallwood & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 778 (“Smallwood”), where it was decided that the “place of effective management” of the trust in question was the UK at the time of the disposal in question, and therefore the gain was subject to UK capital gains tax. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
Karkkainen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
No offence is committed under these Byelaws where a person acts in accordance with the notices or instructions given under Byelaw 12(1) or 12(2). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
The European Court of Justice has given its ruling this morning in Case C-239/05 BVBA Management, Training en Consultancy v Benelux-Merkenbureau, a reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal for a preliminary ruling on several issues of European trade mark law. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:55 pm
Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
It forms a branch of the law of do/us ma/us. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:51 am
(Patel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:07 pm
The action was commenced in the Federal Court by Statement of Claim dated February 9, 2021 (Tragically Hip v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:07 pm
The action was commenced in the Federal Court by Statement of Claim dated February 9, 2021 (Tragically Hip v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:10 am
An interesting outcome, given that most of us probably think that those named in these proscribed lists are as guilty as hell because the EU institutions would not have named them, would they? [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
., v. [read post]
Tabish v. Attorney General and the Legal Framework Governing Physical Coercion in ISA Interrogations
6 Dec 2018, 8:08 am
The latest Supreme Court decision, Tabish v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:47 pm
I posted yesterday on Winston v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:31 am
Hudson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 8:18 am
Castillo-Sang v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
Sering v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
We've been a bit slow on this one, but R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14 offers further light on the quarter pounder v royale with cheese debate, which has occupied much of our time this year. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
We've been a bit slow on this one, but R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14 offers further light on the quarter pounder v royale with cheese debate, which has occupied much of our time this year. [read post]
