Search for: "United States v. California" Results 6901 - 6920 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Under the DACA program, they are permitted to remain in the United States for some period of time as long as they meet certain conditions. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 4:43 am
Summary of Ruling Below: The district court abused its discretion when it dismissed, on the basis of forum non conveniens, an action by U.S. citizen injured in car accident in Japan, alleging breach of insurer's agreement to pay medical costs incurred by her in United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:27 am by Epstein Becker Green
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The land was divided into two units: 608 acres of state park land (Washoe Meadows State Park), and the remainder designated as Lake Valley State Recreation Area to allow continuing operation of an existing golf course (a use not allowed in state parks). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
; Case 4:09-CV-00456-A in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division). [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
  Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Title 59 Chapter 27 is a content-based tax that violates the First Amendment; and 2) whether that tax passes intermediate scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:54 pm by Coral Beach
California resident Kimberly Birbrower filed the case in state court in January 2016. [read post]