Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 9,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
Jones, 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:45 am
In Virginia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Coyle v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
But none of the church autonomy cases during this period—Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
Jeff Skilling, former Enron CEO and Petitioner in the 2010 case Skilling v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
Yet they overlook the Supreme Court’s most recent church property case, Jones v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:34 pm
The Rough Justice programme on iPlayer (while it is available) The Guardian on Jones v Kaney: After supreme court decision, will other witnesses remain immune? [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:49 pm
The decision of Jones v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
By a majority decision (5-2) the UK Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney [2011] UK SC 13, in a leapfrog appeal from a first instance decision, has held that there is no longer any justification for the immunity of expert witnesses from civil suit for breach of duty in relation to their involvement in litigation. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney (see earlier post by Rosalind English) removes the immunity previously enjoyed by those who have acted as experts from suit by their former clients. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
As discussed previously on the Jones v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:16 pm
Wuterich v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:40 am
Roommate.com (3) Watch what you say about lawyers: Marina Tylo, Paul Revere III, Jones Day (5) U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
Second, this week the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Jones v Kaney that expert witnesses are no longer immune from civil suits. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
Moreover, under the doctrine established in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) a claimant may apply to have a claim struck out as an abuse of process on the basis that it does not involve the commission of a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
” John Crane, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
See Reynolds v Times Newspapers Limited [2001] 2 AC 127 HL, which created the defence, and Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 HL, which revitalised it. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Apr. 25, 2008) (holding expert witness should not have been permitted to testify as to his interpretation of a statute); Jones v. [read post]
