Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 40,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
On Appeal: In a 2-1 decision, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 8:41 am
The trial court sustained the demurrer by defendant Tilly’s on the grounds that Plaintiff is not entitled to reporting time pay under the Wage Order because: (1) the phrase “report to work” means that an employee physically appears at the workplace, and; (2) that merely calling in to learn whether an employee will work a call-in shift does not trigger reporting time pay under Wage Order 7. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:51 pm
Commenting on the issue of harm, Cruz offered that "The notion that a man who publicly exposes himself to a young girl or woman, or who publicly masturbates in their presence, does not cause them harm is ridiculous. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill does not propose a damages cap or the power to order the publication of an apology. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:47 am
Two further indictments, on Oct. 2, 2008, and April 16, expanded the charges against him. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
[A federal court has allowed the case to go forward, including on a theory that the Department does this as a "pattern and practice. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
Doe, 74 F.R.D. 587, 589 (D.N.J. 1977). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 7:47 am
Finally, and very significantly, the statute does not grant attorney fees to a prevailing defendant, like the California statute and other statutes. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:23 pm
We further agree with plaintiffs that the exclusion relied upon by defendant, entitled "Wear and Tear," does not apply to this case. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:18 am
At trial the Broker wanted to admit evidence that it had obtained a title insurance policy, relevant to defendant against the breach of fiduciary duty claim. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
A-29-08 (N.J. 2/2/10). [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Accordingly, this Court holds that AC § 10-131(b) does not implicate the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
[FN1: See Doe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:37 am
§ 56.29(2). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Anonymous Physician, 2005 WL 2218359 at *2 (S.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am
Indeed, it already does so. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm
I've recently started looking into anonymous "John Doe" (or "Jane Doe") litigation; generally speaking, people are presumptively required to sue in their own names, but sometimes courts allow them to sue anonymously. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
Moreno (2/24/11) --- Cal.4th ---, 2011 WL 651877, the California Supreme Court has answered three important questions involving arbitration clauses in employment agreements.Plaintiff worked for defendant, a car dealership. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:56 am
Ceesay, an Uber driver, picked up 2 passengers who allegedly murdered him so they could steal his car. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 8:32 am
Does the term “wrongful act” always require that the conduct at issue be “wrongful”? [read post]
