Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 11:05 am
" In the Shepard v Ward, 547 NYS2d 57, the Appellate said that suspicious behavior coupled with anonymous tips provided a basis for reasonable suspicion.In Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New York v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
"Mandamus" is one of a number of the ancient writs that were available under English common law to compel or prohibit actions by a governmental entity. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
The 2007 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 1:35 pm
(State of Alaska v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Available so far in just nine European languages -- none of which is English -- the Opinion of the Advocate General opinion in Case C-52/07 Kanal 5 and TV 4 v STIM makes interesting reading (unless you don't read the right languages, in which case it looks quite menacing on the page). [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 11:54 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
An advisory opinion handed down 4 September in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) may have signalled an end to the English court's ability to issue anti-suit injunctions against parties who commence parallel litigation in other EC Member State countries.The opinion, in Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta SpA) and Others v West Tankers Inc, arises out of the collision of a vessel, owned by West Tankers Inc and chartered to Erg… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
If you remember, Thomas and Pamela McIntosh v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
If you remember, Thomas and Pamela McIntosh v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:16 pm
Writing in 1914 in an English law journal, F.B. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:50 pm
In Allianz Insurance Co Egypt v Aigaion Insurance Co SA [2008] EWHC 1127 (Comm), the English High Court was asked to examine the effect of the term "Deffered [sic] Premium Clause" in the reinsurance slip and to ascertain whether its inclusion was so uncertain as to be of no contractual effect and to make the whole contract ineffective.Allianz alleged that Aigaion had agreed to reinsure 30 percent of the cover provided by Allianz in respect of a fleet of tugs. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Carole Migden, D- San Francisco, is another slap at a court decision, this time the state Supreme Court's decision in Olson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 2:52 pm
Morales v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 3:28 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:01 am
" That sight and Donoghue's consequent illness touched off a legal battle that ended with the issuance of Donoghue v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
Rangel v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
The name of the case is Hope Ranch Park Association v. [read post]
