Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 9,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2019, 6:10 am
Supreme Court, state, and English jurisprudence requiring jury selection to be “public. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The jurisdiction granted by the federal and state legislation only is constitutional under the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
See Naylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:16 am
Vote in McBurney v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:15 pm
The case of Sanghe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products,… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm
Before the Supreme Court's 6-3 judgment in Skinner v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
This project, initiated in 2004 and funded by Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), aims to make Japanese law more accessible to legal community around the globe by translating statutes and court decisions into English [Hooray, says the IPKat]. 11 research groups comprising 45 scholars are currently dealing with various areas of commercial law, including IP. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:58 am
This is a decision of the English Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:06 am
In Costa v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:44 am
"If _____ v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 2:33 am
However, as the Court of Appeal here rightly points out, the applicable Australian statute was materially different from its English counterpart. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:25 am
V. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Take for instance the "Anywayup Cup" case, Haberman v Jackel International [1999] FSR 683. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm
In Monsanto v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:32 am
” I attended a private, Catholic school and my high school English teacher, Mrs. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
I reach the conclusion that I do without having to consider the strength of the submission that it would be wrong to assume that foreign copyright law is the same as English law. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:37 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
